Photo By Sophia Perigo
Story By J.D. McKay
As this track season has gone by, I have been grinding every day. The hard work has shown. This year, I have increased my personal record (PR), and have been very close to breaking it several times. I won the Corydon Stargazer Invite where I PRed. But I was always just waiting for the inevitable. Waiting for my competition season to end and the start of my practice to be an alternate season to begin.
I am happy to say that senior Cam Sturgeon will be all-state and could win state, and senior Austin Gootee is finally hitting the throws he should be and has a shot to get to state as well. But I am kind of frustrated.
In Indiana, track sectionals allows for two athletes in each event. That basically makes it sound like the little schools have a chance against the big schools. In track, the top eight score in each event. First place gets 10, second 8, third 6, fourth 5, until eighth gets 1 point. In practice they really do not have a chance but in theory they do. This gives the appearance of even competition because if each school has the same number of athletes entered, anyone could win. But, the school with the biggest athlete pool always wins. The top four from each sectional advance to regionals.
So now that the rules have been explained, I will explain my problem. I am the third discus thrower on my team, so I cannot throw in sectionals. However, I am the also the third best thrower in our sectional. Meaning that we could get first, second, and third in discus at sectional and send three throwers to regionals. I even have a low chance of going to state. However, I will not get that chance.
Here are a couple of solutions to my problem. First, set a cut off mark for all events. If the athlete hits that mark at any meet, he or she is in sectionals. If a school only has one athlete at that mark then they can have a second athlete in that event. That would allow for all qualified athletes to get their chance to advance into the state tournament. However, that solution would make it less even between big and small schools. To even out the competition, only allow two athletes to score from each school in each event. Basically, if I got third behind Sturgeon and Gootee, I would still go to regionals, but I would not score points for the team.
Track is both an individual and team sport. So changing the rules should not make the team part uneven. However, since it is also an individual sport, all athletes that are qualified to compete in the biggest meets of the year should get the chance. I believe my suggestion could allow for both.
Art by Sam Haney
Story by Gracie Vanover
Social media can be both a blessing and a curse. However, for some male Marvel fans, it appears to be the latter. With the new movie Captain Marvel being released on March 8, many have something to say about the male opinion of this movie. Feminists across platforms like Twitter seem to have the strongest say in what they think about their male peers who dislike the new female lead superhero movie.
After the new movie was in theater for a few days, talk around our school and social media grew with likes and dislikes of the movie. The issue of “men being sexist” against the movie came to my attention one day at my lunch table as it was the discussion topic. One of my peers said he did not entirely care for the movie, as it just was not as good as others to him. His real issue with sharing his opinion, however, was the fact that many female friends took what he was trying to say the wrong way. They felt as if he was saying what he said due to the lack of “sexualizing” a woman hero. In his defense, that was not the cause for dislike, but many insisted on that as the base of his dislike.
With many women in the Marvel fandom adoring the movie and female lead Brie Larson, it is somewhat reasonable to see how they incorrectly interpreted what these men are saying. In the movie, Captain Marvel does not appear as the average woman hero, as her costume is more “bland” compared to others. I think with the change of her costume many assume the dislike is solely due to “non-sexualisation” of Larson. Although many men have clearly stated this is not the case for their dislike, some women keep pushing to say it is when it truly is not.
When it comes down to the actual costuming of the women, Marvel is actually very respectful in making them feel comfortable. But in doing this they also are decently consistent with the comics and their design. To bring the original example back, Larson and her producers agreed on how the original comic book suit would not fit for the movie style but they did not completely obliterate any connection to the comics. When it boils down to the fans as well, no one is angry because she was not shown in sexy spandex. In specifics, not just male fans but many fans were displeased with mainly the plot, according to reviews from metacritic.com.
It seems like many are quick to attack male viewers when it comes to female superheroes and their opinions on them. However, as mentioned beforehand, the dislike is never due to the lack of sexualization. With the world we live in now, many ads in media are meant to sell as sex appeal. Of course with brands like Marvel, DC, or other productions, that is not the intended case. These brands are dedicated to the viewers and bringing them quality content over the basic and easy sex appeal that most everything is branded with.
The fanbase has no right to be mad at the lack of sex appeal because that style of branding is never the focus of the Marvel brand of movies. The idea of male viewers being angry at the lack of sexualization is a false accusation on other viewers’ parts. For other fans or outsiders to accuse the fanbase of that is unjust and a false accusation. Not only is it making that part of the fanbase look bad, but it makes the entire fanbase as a whole look worse as well.
Overall, people use media to claim statements that a lot of time are not true. Even though in this society sex appeal sells content, this is not always the case. Marvel fans were the most recent target of the “only care about sexualized content” facade but it will not be the last. So before people accuse others of this, they need to take a step back and look at the whole picture.